Courtroom
Machine annotation by Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct, cut beats-0.2, prompt beats-0.2. Machine checks passed. 4 quotes checked against the transcript; 7 names checked for a spoken or on-screen source; 1 of 1 visible events checked against a frame. Not human-reviewed. Observations and transcript may still be wrong.
Play from 5:22 on the Internet Archive This passage on the film's page
Evidence and details
Starts here: pause in speech. Sequence 10 · shots 43–47. Observations cite a frame (frame:n) or a time (t:m:ss); frames are the sampled ones above.
- Place
- courtroom (courtroom, interior) evidence: frame:4
- People
- man in dark suit and bow tie, standing, holding papers visible, audible
- man in light suit and bowler hat, seated, adjusting hat visible
- man in dark suit, seated at table, gesturing visible, audible
- man with curly hair, seated at piano visible
- man in dark suit, standing behind witness, holding papers visible
- man in dark suit, seated at desk, likely judge visible
- man in dark suit, standing in background visible
- Seen happening
- Man in bowler hat laughs after being told '76' follows '75'. [frame:4]
- Also said
- “I object Toronto.” 5:40 · “I say, Jasper, what comes after 75? 76. That's the spirit. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.” 5:59
- Seen
- piano [frame:2], courtroom bench [frame:4], witness stand with cage [frame:4], papers [frame:1], bowler hat [frame:1]
- Interpretation
- Model opinion, not evidence: mood: chaotic and comedic; themes: legal farce, absurdity in court, witness unreliability; style notes: static medium shots, high-contrast black-and-white lighting, staged courtroom set with visible audience and musicians
A courtroom scene unfolds with a lawyer questioning a witness about an incident at the Black Bottom Cafe involving Miss Gayle Tempest and Kirk Robin. The judge sustains an objection, and the lawyer rephrases his question while a man in a bowler hat laughs at a joke about numbers.
“Were you in the Black Bottom Cafe on the night of February the 13th?” 5:25 · “Spike Lee!” 5:29 automatic transcript, may be wrong
The record
No renewal found An automated finding, not a verdict. A renewal would have appeared in the Copyright Office's renewal registrations 27 to 29 years after the term began. Those volumes are loaded and our parse of them found no matching renewal. If that is right, a work published 1931–1963 that was not renewed entered the public domain at the end of its 28th year; the volumes are OCR of old print, and the method page reports how often the parse has been found to miss one. Evidence dossier. The finding concerns the US copyright record for the film; it is not clearance for any use, and this page's annotation is machine output.
Share
Paste the permalink anywhere that shows link previews and it carries the frame, the time and the finding. The card image can be saved and used with a credit.
- Permalink
- always the current cut
- Permalink to this version
- warns if the beats are recut later
- Card image
- https://publicreel.org/cards/moment/disorder_in_the_court/b18.png
- Figure for a newsletter or page
- Cite