Living room
Machine annotation by Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct, cut beats-0.2, prompt beats-0.2. Machine checks passed (partial). 2 quotes checked against the transcript; 3 names checked for a spoken or on-screen source; 0 of 2 visible events checked against a frame. Not human-reviewed. Observations and transcript may still be wrong.
Play from 1:24:48 on the Internet Archive This passage on the film's page
Evidence and details
Starts here: pause in speech. Sequence 217 · shots 728–729. Observations cite a frame (frame:n) or a time (t:m:ss); frames are the sampled ones above.
- Place
- living_room (living room, interior) evidence: frame:1
- People
- woman with dark hair in updo, wearing light-colored period dress with lace collar visible
- man with gray hair, wearing brown suit, holding a dark coat visible, audible
- man with dark hair, wearing gray suit with red vest, holding a small object visible, audible
- Seen happening
- A man in a brown suit holds a coat and speaks to another man. [frame:1]
- The man in the brown suit continues speaking while facing the man in the gray suit. [frame:2]
- Seen
- staircase [frame:1], candle-lit lamp [frame:1], dark coat [frame:2], small object (possibly a watch or case) [frame:1]
- Interpretation
- Model opinion, not evidence: mood: tense but polite; themes: apology, generational conflict, formal social interaction; style notes: medium shots, warm interior lighting, period costumes, static camera
Three people stand in a room with period furnishings; one man speaks about apologizing for calling another a reactionary. The setting includes a staircase and candle-lit lamps, suggesting an interior from the late 19th or early 20th century.
“But we're going to have that Indian hearing tomorrow morning. Sir, about our conversation earlier this evening, I believe I'd better apologize.” 84:53 · “Yes, sir, I've been thinking it over and over. When I called you a reactionary, that's merely my generation's...” 85:02 automatic transcript, may be wrong
The record
No renewal found An automated finding, not a verdict. A renewal would have appeared in the Copyright Office's renewal registrations 27 to 29 years after the term began. Those volumes are loaded and our parse of them found no matching renewal. If that is right, a work published 1931–1963 that was not renewed entered the public domain at the end of its 28th year; the volumes are OCR of old print, and the method page reports how often the parse has been found to miss one. Evidence dossier. The finding concerns the US copyright record for the film; it is not clearance for any use, and this page's annotation is machine output.
Share
Paste the permalink anywhere that shows link previews and it carries the frame, the time and the finding. The card image can be saved and used with a credit.
- Permalink
- always the current cut
- Permalink to this version
- warns if the beats are recut later
- Card image
- https://publicreel.org/cards/moment/mclintok_widescreen/b329.png
- Figure for a newsletter or page
- Cite