Courtroom
Machine annotation by Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct, cut beats-0.2, prompt beats-0.2. Machine checks passed (partial). 4 quotes checked against the transcript; 6 names checked for a spoken or on-screen source; 1 of 2 visible events checked against a frame. Not human-reviewed. Observations and transcript may still be wrong.
Play from 1:44:19 on the Internet Archive This passage on the film's page
Evidence and details
Starts here: pause in speech. Sequence 174 · shots 389–390. Observations cite a frame (frame:n) or a time (t:m:ss); frames are the sampled ones above.
- Place
- (courtroom, interior) evidence: frame:1
- People
- Mr. Eldred (named at t:104:20): older man, white hair, dark suit, standing visible, audible
- Mrs. Williams (named at t:104:27): woman, dark hat, dark coat, seated visible, audible
- man, dark suit, standing, facing p1 visible
- man, seated at bench, dark suit visible
- man, seated, dark suit, behind p3 visible
- man, seated, back to camera, dark suit visible
- Seen happening
- Mrs. Williams stands and faces Mr. Eldred while holding papers. [frame:2]
- Mr. Eldred holds a document while questioning Mrs. Williams in a courtroom. [frame:1]
- Also said
- “According to the inscription to Walt, my adoring and adored husband, Irene, this belongs to Mr. Williams.” 104:33 · “I'm touched that he should have wanted it so badly.” 104:43
- Seen
- photograph [frame:1], telegram [frame:1], courtroom bench [frame:1], American flag [frame:2], wooden paneling [frame:1], stacks of books/papers [frame:1]
- Interpretation
- Model opinion, not evidence: mood: tense and formal; themes: legal procedure, personal sentiment in evidence, identity through handwriting; style notes: static medium shots, high-contrast black-and-white lighting, formal courtroom framing
In a courtroom, a witness is questioned about handwriting on a photograph and a telegram. The witness confirms the handwriting is hers and makes a remark about the photograph's sentimental value.
“Mr. Eldred, what's the purpose in calling this witness?” 104:20 · “Now, Mrs. Williams, this photograph of you... was stolen from my apartment. So?” 104:27 automatic transcript, may be wrong
The record
No renewal found An automated finding, not a verdict. A renewal would have appeared in the Copyright Office's renewal registrations 27 to 29 years after the term began. Those volumes are loaded and our parse of them found no matching renewal. If that is right, a work published 1931–1963 that was not renewed entered the public domain at the end of its 28th year; the volumes are OCR of old print, and the method page reports how often the parse has been found to miss one. Evidence dossier. The finding concerns the US copyright record for the film; it is not clearance for any use, and this page's annotation is machine output.
Share
Paste the permalink anywhere that shows link previews and it carries the frame, the time and the finding. The card image can be saved and used with a credit.
- Permalink
- always the current cut
- Permalink to this version
- warns if the beats are recut later
- Card image
- https://publicreel.org/cards/moment/impact/b238.png
- Figure for a newsletter or page
- Cite