Restaurant
Machine annotation by Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct, cut beats-0.2, prompt beats-0.2. Machine checks passed (partial). 4 quotes checked against the transcript; 3 names checked for a spoken or on-screen source; 1 of 4 visible events checked against a frame. Not human-reviewed. Observations and transcript may still be wrong.
Play from 19:54 on the Internet Archive This passage on the film's page
Evidence and details
Starts here: pause in speech. Sequence 2 · shots 79–82. Observations cite a frame (frame:n) or a time (t:m:ss); frames are the sampled ones above.
- Place
- restaurant (restaurant, interior) evidence: frame:1
- People
- man in dark suit and patterned tie, clean-shaven, mid-30s visible, audible
- Walter (named at t:19:55): man in light suit with flower boutonniere, dark hair, mid-30s visible, audible
- Hildy (named at t:20:17): woman in dark coat and hat with bow, mid-30s visible, audible
- Seen happening
- A man in a dark suit speaks to Walter about the case. [frame:1]
- The man in the dark suit turns his head to speak. [frame:2]
- Walter and the man in the dark suit face each other across the table. [frame:3]
- Hildy looks at Walter while he speaks. [frame:4]
- Also said
- “Put him away, because it happened to be a colored policeman. You know what that means, Hildy.” 20:17 · “The coloured vote is important in this town. Especially with an election.” 20:21
- Seen
- dining table [frame:1], glassware and silverware [frame:1], bottle [frame:1], woman's hat with bow [frame:4]
- Interpretation
- Model opinion, not evidence: mood: tense and conversational; themes: political corruption, media influence, racial injustice; style notes: medium shots, high-contrast lighting, tight framing around the table
Three people sit at a table in a crowded restaurant, discussing the Earl Williams case. The conversation reveals that Williams, a man who shot a Black policeman, is scheduled to be executed, and political considerations are influencing the outcome.
“Thanks, Gus.” 19:55 · “This is bad business. What's the matter Walter? The Earl Williams case.” 19:55 automatic transcript, may be wrong
The record
No renewal found An automated finding, not a verdict. A renewal would have appeared in the Copyright Office's renewal registrations 27 to 29 years after the term began. Those volumes are loaded and our parse of them found no matching renewal. If that is right, a work published 1931–1963 that was not renewed entered the public domain at the end of its 28th year; the volumes are OCR of old print, and the method page reports how often the parse has been found to miss one. Evidence dossier. The finding concerns the US copyright record for the film; it is not clearance for any use, and this page's annotation is machine output.
Share
Paste the permalink anywhere that shows link previews and it carries the frame, the time and the finding. The card image can be saved and used with a credit.
- Permalink
- always the current cut
- Permalink to this version
- warns if the beats are recut later
- Card image
- https://publicreel.org/cards/moment/his_girl_friday/b32.png
- Figure for a newsletter or page
- Cite