Newsroom
Machine annotation by Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct, cut beats-0.2, prompt beats-0.2. Machine checks passed (partial). 4 quotes checked against the transcript; 4 names checked for a spoken or on-screen source; 0 of 2 visible events checked against a frame. Not human-reviewed. Observations and transcript may still be wrong.
Play from 1:21:16 on the Internet Archive This passage on the film's page
Evidence and details
Starts here: pause in speech. Sequence 112 · shots 502–503. Observations cite a frame (frame:n) or a time (t:m:ss); frames are the sampled ones above.
- Place
- newsroom (newsroom, interior) evidence: frame:1
- People
- Madeline Damien (named at t:81:29): woman's face in newspaper photo, dark hair, makeup visible
- man in suit and tie, mid-40s, speaking, surrounded by cameras and microphones visible
- Melody McLeod (named at t:81:22): unseen, voice only audible
- Jack Garrett (named at t:81:33): unseen, mentioned in transcript mentioned
- Seen happening
- A newspaper headline announces Madeline Damien's acquittal in a murder case. [frame:1]
- A man in a suit is shown speaking amid cameras and microphones, superimposed over newspaper images. [frame:2]
- Also said
- “- The employee, Jack Garrett.” 81:33 · “It was a trial marked by many surprises.” 81:36
- Seen
- newspaper, microphones, cameras
- On screen
- MADELINE DAMIEN FREED IN MURDER CASE
- Interpretation
- Model opinion, not evidence: mood: dramatic, sensational; themes: media frenzy, legal drama, public scandal; style notes: black-and-white, newspaper montage, superimposed shots, studio lighting
A newspaper headline announces Madeline Damien's acquittal in a murder case, while a man in a suit appears in a superimposed shot with cameras and microphones. The transcript mentions Melody McLeod, Madeline Damien, and Jack Garrett in the context of a trial with surprises.
“Extra, extra, we're all about it. Melody McLeod of Minnesota.” 81:22 · “Madeline Damien and” 81:29 automatic transcript, may be wrong
The record
No renewal found An automated finding, not a verdict. A renewal would have appeared in the Copyright Office's renewal registrations 27 to 29 years after the term began. Those volumes are loaded and our parse of them found no matching renewal. If that is right, a work published 1931–1963 that was not renewed entered the public domain at the end of its 28th year; the volumes are OCR of old print, and the method page reports how often the parse has been found to miss one. Evidence dossier. The finding concerns the US copyright record for the film; it is not clearance for any use, and this page's annotation is machine output.
Share
Paste the permalink anywhere that shows link previews and it carries the frame, the time and the finding. The card image can be saved and used with a credit.
- Permalink
- always the current cut
- Permalink to this version
- warns if the beats are recut later
- Card image
- https://publicreel.org/cards/moment/dishonored_lady/b227.png
- Figure for a newsletter or page
- Cite