Courtroom
Machine annotation by Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct, cut beats-0.2, prompt beats-0.2. Machine checks passed (partial). 4 quotes checked against the transcript; 4 names checked for a spoken or on-screen source; 1 of 4 visible events checked against a frame. Not human-reviewed. Observations and transcript may still be wrong.
Play from 1:13:38 on the Internet Archive This passage on the film's page
Evidence and details
Starts here: pause in speech. Sequence 99 · shots 440–445. Observations cite a frame (frame:n) or a time (t:m:ss); frames are the sampled ones above.
- Place
- courtroom (courtroom, interior) evidence: frame:1
- People
- woman with dark wavy hair, wearing a patterned jacket with a white collar visible, audible
- man with light hair, wearing a light suit and tie, seated visible
- man with bald head, wearing a dark suit and tie, seated visible
- man in dark suit standing at a podium, back to camera visible
- Seen happening
- A woman is seated in a witness stand in a courtroom. [frame:1]
- Two men are seated in the courtroom, observing the proceedings. [frame:2]
- The woman in the witness stand is shown in close-up, facing someone off-camera. [frame:3]
- The woman continues to face the off-camera person, her expression unchanged. [frame:4]
- Also said
- “No, I didn't see him. You didn't see him. I only heard his voice. You seem very certain it was a man.” 74:45 · “Why not a burglar?” 75:07
- Seen
- wooden witness stand [frame:1], courtroom podium [frame:1], jury box [frame:1], courtroom benches [frame:1]
- Interpretation
- Model opinion, not evidence: mood: tense and confrontational; themes: legal interrogation, personal accountability, mystery; style notes: black-and-white, medium and close-up shots, formal courtroom framing, high-contrast lighting
A woman testifies in a courtroom while two men observe; the transcript reveals an interrogation about her relationship with a man named Cortland and a mysterious intruder. No names are spoken that can be assigned to the visible people.
“I really met her.” 73:45 · “I made a mistake.” 74:34 automatic transcript, may be wrong
The record
No renewal found An automated finding, not a verdict. A renewal would have appeared in the Copyright Office's renewal registrations 27 to 29 years after the term began. Those volumes are loaded and our parse of them found no matching renewal. If that is right, a work published 1931–1963 that was not renewed entered the public domain at the end of its 28th year; the volumes are OCR of old print, and the method page reports how often the parse has been found to miss one. Evidence dossier. The finding concerns the US copyright record for the film; it is not clearance for any use, and this page's annotation is machine output.
Share
Paste the permalink anywhere that shows link previews and it carries the frame, the time and the finding. The card image can be saved and used with a credit.
- Permalink
- always the current cut
- Permalink to this version
- warns if the beats are recut later
- Card image
- https://publicreel.org/cards/moment/dishonored_lady/b200.png
- Figure for a newsletter or page
- Cite