Courtroom
Machine annotation by Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct, cut beats-0.2, prompt beats-0.2. Machine checks passed. 4 quotes checked against the transcript; 6 names checked for a spoken or on-screen source; no visible events claimed. Not human-reviewed. Observations and transcript may still be wrong.
Play from 1:12:47 on the Internet Archive This passage on the film's page
Evidence and details
Starts here: topic shift in dialogue. Sequence 98 · shots 430–431. Observations cite a frame (frame:n) or a time (t:m:ss); frames are the sampled ones above.
- Place
- courtroom (courtroom, interior) evidence: frame:1
- People
- woman, dark hair, wearing a patterned blouse with a light collar, seated at a table visible
- Mr. O'Brien (named at t:72:49): older man, white hair, dark suit, standing at a table with papers visible, audible
- Dr. Cusman (named at t:73:00): man, light hair, wearing a suit with a lapel pin, seated at the witness stand visible, audible
- man, wearing a dark robe, seated at a high bench visible
- man, standing behind the courtroom, wearing a dark uniform visible
- multiple spectators, seated in the gallery visible
- Also said
- “Well, Your Honor, I'm merely trying to clarify for the jury.” 72:51 · “One more question, Dr. Cusman.” 73:00
- Seen
- courtroom table [frame:1], judge's bench [frame:2], American flag [frame:2], papers on table [frame:1]
- Interpretation
- Model opinion, not evidence: mood: tense and formal; themes: legal procedure, motive and emotion in trial, witness testimony; style notes: static medium shots, high-contrast black-and-white lighting, formal courtroom framing with judge elevated
A courtroom scene unfolds with a lawyer questioning a witness while a judge presides and a defendant sits at the table. The transcript shows objections and a line of questioning about the witness's feelings toward the defendant.
“I object, Your Honor.” 72:47 · “Mr. O'Brien, haven't you covered your point?” 72:49 automatic transcript, may be wrong
The record
No renewal found An automated finding, not a verdict. A renewal would have appeared in the Copyright Office's renewal registrations 27 to 29 years after the term began. Those volumes are loaded and our parse of them found no matching renewal. If that is right, a work published 1931–1963 that was not renewed entered the public domain at the end of its 28th year; the volumes are OCR of old print, and the method page reports how often the parse has been found to miss one. Evidence dossier. The finding concerns the US copyright record for the film; it is not clearance for any use, and this page's annotation is machine output.
Share
Paste the permalink anywhere that shows link previews and it carries the frame, the time and the finding. The card image can be saved and used with a credit.
- Permalink
- always the current cut
- Permalink to this version
- warns if the beats are recut later
- Card image
- https://publicreel.org/cards/moment/dishonored_lady/b195.png
- Figure for a newsletter or page
- Cite