Courtroom
Machine annotation by Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct, cut beats-0.2, prompt beats-0.2. Machine checks passed. 4 quotes checked against the transcript; 3 names checked for a spoken or on-screen source; no visible events claimed. Not human-reviewed. Observations and transcript may still be wrong.
Play from 1:09:15 on the Internet Archive This passage on the film's page
Evidence and details
Starts here: pause in speech. Sequence 93 · shots 413–417. Observations cite a frame (frame:n) or a time (t:m:ss); frames are the sampled ones above.
- Place
- courtroom (courtroom, interior) evidence: frame:1
- People
- man in dark suit, white pocket square, seated, clean-shaven, mid-40s visible
- man in dark suit, glasses, standing, leaning on railing, mid-40s visible
- man in pinstripe suit, dark tie, seated in audience, light hair, mid-40s visible
- Mentioned
- It is mentioned that the defendant refused to confide in Dr. Cousins. [t:69:23]
- Also said
- “Having met Dr. Cousins, I think I can see why Miss Damien” 69:26 · “It's my impression that Dr. Cousins hasn't the capacity” 69:36
- Seen
- wooden railing [frame:1], courtroom bench [frame:1], pinstripe suit [frame:2], patterned tie [frame:4]
- Interpretation
- Model opinion, not evidence: mood: tense and formal; themes: legal proceedings, character assessment, doubt and hesitation; style notes: static medium shots, high-contrast black-and-white lighting, formal courtroom attire, focused framing on speakers
Two men in suits are shown in a courtroom setting, one seated and one standing, while a third man in a pinstripe suit is visible in the audience. The transcript indicates a discussion about Dr. Cousins and his perceived lack of capacity, which is tied to the defendant's hesitation to confide in him.
“Did you ever meet Dr. Cousins?” 69:15 · “and yet the defendant refused to confide in him.” 69:23 automatic transcript, may be wrong
The record
No renewal found An automated finding, not a verdict. A renewal would have appeared in the Copyright Office's renewal registrations 27 to 29 years after the term began. Those volumes are loaded and our parse of them found no matching renewal. If that is right, a work published 1931–1963 that was not renewed entered the public domain at the end of its 28th year; the volumes are OCR of old print, and the method page reports how often the parse has been found to miss one. Evidence dossier. The finding concerns the US copyright record for the film; it is not clearance for any use, and this page's annotation is machine output.
Share
Paste the permalink anywhere that shows link previews and it carries the frame, the time and the finding. The card image can be saved and used with a credit.
- Permalink
- always the current cut
- Permalink to this version
- warns if the beats are recut later
- Card image
- https://publicreel.org/cards/moment/dishonored_lady/b188.png
- Figure for a newsletter or page
- Cite