Courtroom
Machine annotation by Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct, cut beats-0.2, prompt beats-0.2. Machine checks passed. 4 quotes checked against the transcript; 6 names checked for a spoken or on-screen source; no visible events claimed. Not human-reviewed. Observations and transcript may still be wrong.
Play from 1:08:26 on the Internet Archive This passage on the film's page
Evidence and details
Starts here: topic shift in dialogue. Sequence 93 · shots 402–407. Observations cite a frame (frame:n) or a time (t:m:ss); frames are the sampled ones above.
- Place
- courtroom (courtroom, interior) evidence: frame:1
- People
- older man, balding, wearing judge's robe, seated at high bench visible
- man in suit, standing, speaking to another man visible
- man in suit, seated, listening visible
- Miss Damien (named at t:68:37): woman with dark hair, wearing patterned dress, seated in courtroom visible
- jury and spectators, various ages and attire, seated in rows visible
- man in suit, possibly doctor, speaking audible, mentioned
- Also said
- “Do you mind telling us doctor in your opinion just what was Miss Damien's problem?” 68:40 · “That is-- a confidential matter between doctors” 68:45
- Seen
- judge's bench [frame:1], courtroom window showing city buildings [frame:2], jury box [frame:3], defendant's chair [frame:4]
- Interpretation
- Model opinion, not evidence: mood: tense and formal; themes: legal procedure, confidentiality, judicial authority; style notes: static medium shots, high-contrast black-and-white lighting, formal courtroom framing
A courtroom scene unfolds where a doctor is questioned about a patient's confidential issue, and the judge overrules an objection. The defendant, Miss Damien, is present as the jury and spectators observe.
“Objection.” 68:26 · “Objection overruled.” 68:27 automatic transcript, may be wrong
The record
No renewal found An automated finding, not a verdict. A renewal would have appeared in the Copyright Office's renewal registrations 27 to 29 years after the term began. Those volumes are loaded and our parse of them found no matching renewal. If that is right, a work published 1931–1963 that was not renewed entered the public domain at the end of its 28th year; the volumes are OCR of old print, and the method page reports how often the parse has been found to miss one. Evidence dossier. The finding concerns the US copyright record for the film; it is not clearance for any use, and this page's annotation is machine output.
Share
Paste the permalink anywhere that shows link previews and it carries the frame, the time and the finding. The card image can be saved and used with a credit.
- Permalink
- always the current cut
- Permalink to this version
- warns if the beats are recut later
- Card image
- https://publicreel.org/cards/moment/dishonored_lady/b186.png
- Figure for a newsletter or page
- Cite