Courtroom
Machine annotation by Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct, cut beats-0.2, prompt beats-0.2. Machine checks passed (partial). 4 quotes checked against the transcript; 5 names checked for a spoken or on-screen source; 0 of 2 visible events checked against a frame. Not human-reviewed. Observations and transcript may still be wrong.
Play from 1:07:53 on the Internet Archive This passage on the film's page
Evidence and details
Starts here: pause in speech. Sequence 93 · shots 397–398. Observations cite a frame (frame:n) or a time (t:m:ss); frames are the sampled ones above.
- Place
- courtroom (courtroom, interior) evidence: frame:1
- People
- man in suit and tie, standing, mid-30s to 40s, average build visible, audible
- man in suit, seated, mid-40s to 50s, heavier build, balding visible
- man in pinstripe suit and tie, seated, 30s, fair hair, serious expression visible
- woman with dark hair, seated, wearing hat and earrings visible
- man in suit, seated, older, mustache visible
- Seen happening
- The man stands in a courtroom while others observe. [frame:1]
- A man in a pinstripe suit looks forward, seated among spectators. [frame:2]
- Mentioned
- The transcript implies a discussion about whether people seek psychiatric help only when they feel unbalanced. [t:68:02]
- Also said
- “- Mrs. Damien came to you as a patient?” 67:56 · “Isn't it true, Doctor, that people do not go to a psychiatrist unless they consider themselves” 68:02
- Seen
- wooden courtroom bench, pinstripe suit, hat and earrings
- Interpretation
- Model opinion, not evidence: mood: tense and formal; themes: legal inquiry, psychiatry, public scrutiny; style notes: black-and-white, medium shots, high-contrast lighting typical of 1940s courtroom drama
A courtroom scene where a man in a suit is being questioned about a patient named Mrs. Damien. The transcript indicates a discussion about whether patients seek psychiatric help voluntarily or due to perceived imbalance.
“for psychiatrists?” 67:54 · “I am.” 67:55 automatic transcript, may be wrong
The record
No renewal found An automated finding, not a verdict. A renewal would have appeared in the Copyright Office's renewal registrations 27 to 29 years after the term began. Those volumes are loaded and our parse of them found no matching renewal. If that is right, a work published 1931–1963 that was not renewed entered the public domain at the end of its 28th year; the volumes are OCR of old print, and the method page reports how often the parse has been found to miss one. Evidence dossier. The finding concerns the US copyright record for the film; it is not clearance for any use, and this page's annotation is machine output.
Share
Paste the permalink anywhere that shows link previews and it carries the frame, the time and the finding. The card image can be saved and used with a credit.
- Permalink
- always the current cut
- Permalink to this version
- warns if the beats are recut later
- Card image
- https://publicreel.org/cards/moment/dishonored_lady/b184.png
- Figure for a newsletter or page
- Cite