Courtroom
Machine annotation by Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct, cut beats-0.2, prompt beats-0.2. Machine checks passed (partial). 4 quotes checked against the transcript; 5 names checked for a spoken or on-screen source; 1 of 3 visible events checked against a frame. Not human-reviewed. Observations and transcript may still be wrong.
Play from 1:05:50 on the Internet Archive This passage on the film's page
Evidence and details
Starts here: pause in speech. Sequence 91 · shots 387–390. Observations cite a frame (frame:n) or a time (t:m:ss); frames are the sampled ones above.
- Place
- courtroom (courtroom, interior) evidence: frame:1
- People
- man, middle-aged, wearing dark suit, tie, and glasses, standing visible
- man, older, balding, wearing dark suit and patterned tie, seated visible
- woman, dark hair, wearing light-colored dress, seated visible
- woman, blonde, wearing white dress and white hat with floral embroidery, seated visible
- man, older, wearing dark robe, seated in elevated chair visible
- Seen happening
- A man in a suit stands facing a seated woman in a courtroom. [frame:1]
- The man in the suit addresses the woman in white; a judge is visible behind them. [frame:3]
- The man in the suit continues to speak to the woman in white. [frame:4]
- Also said
- “If I don't, we haven't a chance.” 65:55 · “Were you a close friend of the defendant?” 66:02
- Seen
- wooden courtroom bench, judge's elevated chair, American flag, white hat with floral embroidery
- Interpretation
- Model opinion, not evidence: mood: tense; themes: legal drama, cross-examination, personal testimony; style notes: static medium shots, high-contrast black-and-white lighting, formal courtroom framing
In a courtroom, a man in a suit questions a woman in a white dress and hat while a judge sits in the background. The transcript indicates a cross-examination is underway, with the witness confirming she was a close friend of the defendant and confided in her.
“Your witness, Mr. Mitchell.” 65:52 · “I've got to cross it.” 65:54 automatic transcript, may be wrong
The record
No renewal found An automated finding, not a verdict. A renewal would have appeared in the Copyright Office's renewal registrations 27 to 29 years after the term began. Those volumes are loaded and our parse of them found no matching renewal. If that is right, a work published 1931–1963 that was not renewed entered the public domain at the end of its 28th year; the volumes are OCR of old print, and the method page reports how often the parse has been found to miss one. Evidence dossier. The finding concerns the US copyright record for the film; it is not clearance for any use, and this page's annotation is machine output.
Share
Paste the permalink anywhere that shows link previews and it carries the frame, the time and the finding. The card image can be saved and used with a credit.
- Permalink
- always the current cut
- Permalink to this version
- warns if the beats are recut later
- Card image
- https://publicreel.org/cards/moment/dishonored_lady/b179.png
- Figure for a newsletter or page
- Cite