Living room
Machine annotation by Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct, cut beats-0.2, prompt beats-0.2. Machine checks passed (partial). 4 quotes checked against the transcript; 3 names checked for a spoken or on-screen source; 0 of 2 visible events checked against a frame. Not human-reviewed. Observations and transcript may still be wrong.
Play from 15:05 on the Internet Archive This passage on the film's page
Evidence and details
Starts here: pause in speech. Sequence 17 · shots 58–59. Observations cite a frame (frame:n) or a time (t:m:ss); frames are the sampled ones above.
- Place
- living_room (living room, interior) evidence: frame:1
- People
- woman, dark hair, wearing a patterned dress, seated visible
- man, dark hair, wearing a dark suit, standing with hands in pockets visible
- Eric (named at t:15:33): man, dark hair, wearing a light-colored suit, pouring from a bottle visible
- Seen happening
- A man pours drinks from a bottle into glasses on a table. [frame:1]
- A man and a woman stand facing each other in a doorway. [frame:2]
- Also said
- “I was in a movie.” 15:48 · “Now look here, Tuppo. I resent that. That's the third time today you've resented something.” 16:23
- Seen
- round table with drinks and flowers, bottle being poured, lamp on side table, framed picture on wall, doorway with wall sconce, sofa in background
- Interpretation
- Model opinion, not evidence: mood: tense and comedic; themes: wedding mishap, social etiquette, miscommunication; style notes: medium shots, static framing, studio lighting, formal attire
Three people are in a room; one man pours drinks while another man and a woman stand facing each other. The transcript reveals a wedding-related conflict over one man attending a movie instead of the ceremony, with references to Uncle Fred and a bachelor party.
“You know, this was a very happy thought on Uncle Fred's part, darling. Darling!” 15:15 · “I went to a movie. A movie? Henry, did you hear that?” 15:33 automatic transcript, may be wrong
The record
No renewal found An automated finding, not a verdict. A renewal would have appeared in the Copyright Office's renewal registrations 27 to 29 years after the term began. Those volumes are loaded and our parse of them found no matching renewal. If that is right, a work published 1931–1963 that was not renewed entered the public domain at the end of its 28th year; the volumes are OCR of old print, and the method page reports how often the parse has been found to miss one. Evidence dossier. The finding concerns the US copyright record for the film; it is not clearance for any use, and this page's annotation is machine output.
Share
Paste the permalink anywhere that shows link previews and it carries the frame, the time and the finding. The card image can be saved and used with a credit.
- Permalink
- always the current cut
- Permalink to this version
- warns if the beats are recut later
- Card image
- https://publicreel.org/cards/moment/bride_for_henry_ipod/b36.png
- Figure for a newsletter or page
- Cite