1 FNGHE

never it is necessary to indicate a variation between the information given in the application and in the copy of the work with respect to the claimant’s name or date of publication, the data from the application are given first, followed by the phrase “in notice” and the data given in the work; e.g

Registration LP24500 No renewal found

Term began: 1963-01-19
Claimant: Richard Roe & Co
Class: LP — published photoplay (numbering series begun Jan. 1950)
Finding: no renewal entry found for 1990-1992 or in the Copyright Office renewal records 1978-2025
In the public domain since: 1 January 1992 (end of the 28th year, no renewal)

A renewal would have appeared in the Copyright Office's renewal registrations 27 to 29 years after the term began. Those volumes are loaded and no matching renewal was found. A work published 1931–1963 that was not renewed entered the public domain at the end of its 28th year.

A renewal had to be filed in the 28th year and would be listed in the 1990 or 1991 volume; volumes searched: 1990, 1991, 1992.

The renewal sections are OCR text of printed volumes; a damaged record can hide a renewal. Before relying on this, search the linked volumes yourself for the title and for number LP24500.

Catalog entry

Catalog of Copyright Entries, Third Series, Parts 12–13: Motion Pictures, 1963, Internet Archive catalogofcopyr3171213libr (OCR text), lines 410–417.

For published works, whenever it is necessary 
to indicate a variation between the information 
given in the application and in the copy of the 
work with respect to the claimant’s name or date 
of publication, the data from the application are 
given first, followed by the phrase “in notice” 
and the data given in the work; e.g., © Richard 
Roe & Co.; 19Jan63 (in notice: 1962); LP24500.

Copies on the Internet Archive

Searched on 5 September 2026; no item with this title and year was found.

Search the Internet Archive yourself · JSON